FIVA
  • FIVA Overview
    • Introduction
    • Problem & Solution
    • Importance to the Space
  • FIVA Mechanics
    • Glossary
    • Understanding the Basics
    • Protocol Components
      • SY (Standardized Yield Token)
      • Yield Stripping
      • PT (Principal Token)
      • YT (Yield Token)
      • FIVA's AMM Design
    • Fee Structure
    • P&L in FIVA
    • FAQ
  • FIVA Manual
    • Getting Started
    • Use Cases
    • PT - Fixing Yield
    • YT - Leveraged Yield Farming
    • LP - Liquidity Provision
    • Mint - Get Liquidity from Future Yields Today
    • Arbitrage Opportunities
  • FIVA Strategies
    • EVAA
      • PT - Fixed USDT Yield
      • YT - EVAA Point Farming with up to 250x Multiplier
      • LP - Enhancing Your EVAA Returns
      • Mint - Get you Future USDT Yield now
    • Ethena
      • PT - Fixed USDe Returns
      • YT - Farming Ethena Airdrop with 60x Multiplier
      • LP - Multiple Income Streams
    • Storm Trade
      • PT - Fixed Yield on SLP
      • YT - Efficient Reward & Yield Farming on Storm
      • LP - Maximizing Returns from Storm Vaults
      • Max Supply - Determination Framework for Storm SLP Market
    • Tonstakers
      • LP - Enhancing Your Tonstakers Returns
  • FIVA Rewards
    • The Points System
    • Genesis Pass Collection
  • FIVA Pioneers Campaign
  • Security
    • Risks
      • Smart Contract Risk
      • Underlying Protocol Risk
      • Oracle Risk
      • PT Risks
        • Market Risk
        • Liquidity Risk
      • YT Risks
        • Market Risk
        • Implied Leverage
        • Zero Value at Maturity
        • Liquidity Risk
      • LP Risks
        • Impermanent Loss
        • Market Risk
        • Additional Considerations for LPs
    • Audit Report - Tonbit
  • Developers
    • SDK
    • npm package
    • Integrating Fixed-Rate Staking
      • SDK - Guide for Fixed Staking
      • API - Pools Metrics Endpoint
  • Links
    • Website
    • Telegram App
    • Telegram Channel
    • Telegram Community
    • X (Twitter)
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Understanding Smart Contract Risk in DeFi
  • FIVA's Smart Contract Security Measures
  • Residual Risk Considerations
  1. Security
  2. Risks

Smart Contract Risk

PreviousRisksNextUnderlying Protocol Risk

Last updated 22 days ago

Understanding Smart Contract Risk in DeFi

Smart contract risk represents one of the most fundamental considerations when interacting with any decentralized finance protocol. For FIVA, this risk stems from the complex nature of the smart contracts that power our yield tokenization functionality on the TON blockchain.

Smart contracts are essentially self-executing code that automate financial transactions according to predefined rules. While they eliminate many traditional counterparty risks, they introduce technical risks related to code implementation. Even with extensive testing and auditing, smart contracts may contain vulnerabilities that could potentially lead to unexpected behavior or, in worst-case scenarios, loss of funds.

The TON blockchain's unique architecture and its smart contract language (FunC) present both advantages and specific security considerations that differ from EVM-compatible environments. The newness of the TON DeFi ecosystem means that security best practices are still evolving, making rigorous testing and multiple layers of security verification essential.

FIVA's Smart Contract Security Measures

FIVA has implemented a comprehensive security framework to minimize smart contract risk:

Independent Security Audits:

  • Completed thorough security audit by Tonbit, a respected security firm in the TON ecosystem (full report available [])

  • Second comprehensive audit currently in progress with another leading security firm to provide additional verification

  • Plans for ongoing periodic audits as the protocol evolves

Extensive Testing and Deployment Strategy:

  • Over 6 months of continuous operation on TON testnet before mainnet deployment

  • Comprehensive test suite covering both expected operations and edge cases

  • Progressive deployment strategy with gradually increasing risk exposure limits

Technical Expertise and Development Practices:

  • Smart contracts written in FunC by developers with extensive experience in TON blockchain development

  • Implementation follows all current best practices for TON smart contract development

  • Rigorous internal code review processes before any deployment

  • Conservative approach to complex functionality, prioritizing security over feature richness

Operational Security Measures:

  • Emergency pause functionality for critical protocol components

  • Multi-signature control for administrative functions requiring approval from multiple independent parties

  • 24/7 incident response team ready to address any emerging security concerns

Residual Risk Considerations

Despite these extensive precautions, users should understand that interacting with any smart contract involves inherent risk that cannot be completely eliminated. The following factors contribute to residual smart contract risk:

  • The relatively early stage of the TON DeFi ecosystem means fewer battle-tested contract patterns and libraries compared to more established blockchains

  • Complex financial mechanisms like yield tokenization introduce sophisticated logic that increases the potential attack surface

  • Interactions between multiple contracts create complexity that can be difficult to fully analyze in all possible scenarios

  • Future upgrades or parameter adjustments could potentially introduce new vulnerabilities

We strongly recommend that users:

  1. Start with smaller positions to understand how the protocol functions before committing significant capital

  2. Stay informed about protocol updates and security announcements

  3. Understand the specific functions they are interacting with

  4. Consider the smart contract risk in the context of their overall investment strategy and risk tolerance

FIVA is committed to maintaining the highest security standards possible while being transparent about the inherent risks of smart contract interaction. Our ongoing security efforts aim to continuously strengthen protocol safety as the ecosystem evolves.

here