FIVA
  • FIVA Overview
    • Introduction
    • Problem & Solution
    • Importance to the Space
  • FIVA Mechanics
    • Glossary
    • Understanding the Basics
    • Protocol Components
      • SY (Standardized Yield Token)
      • Yield Stripping
      • PT (Principal Token)
      • YT (Yield Token)
      • FIVA's AMM Design
    • Fee Structure
    • P&L in FIVA
    • FAQ
  • FIVA Manual
    • Getting Started
    • Use Cases
    • PT - Fixing Yield
    • YT - Leveraged Yield Farming
    • LP - Liquidity Provision
    • Mint - Get Liquidity from Future Yields Today
    • Arbitrage Opportunities
  • FIVA Strategies
    • EVAA
      • PT - Fixed USDT Yield
      • YT - EVAA Point Farming with up to 250x Multiplier
      • LP - Enhancing Your EVAA Returns
      • Mint - Get you Future USDT Yield now
    • Ethena
      • PT - Fixed USDe Returns
      • YT - Farming Ethena Airdrop with 60x Multiplier
      • LP - Multiple Income Streams
    • Storm Trade
      • PT - Fixed Yield on SLP
      • YT - Efficient Reward & Yield Farming on Storm
      • LP - Maximizing Returns from Storm Vaults
      • Max Supply - Determination Framework for Storm SLP Market
    • Tonstakers
      • LP - Enhancing Your Tonstakers Returns
  • FIVA Rewards
    • The Points System
    • Genesis Pass Collection
  • FIVA Pioneers Campaign
  • Security
    • Risks
      • Smart Contract Risk
      • Underlying Protocol Risk
      • Oracle Risk
      • PT Risks
        • Market Risk
        • Liquidity Risk
      • YT Risks
        • Market Risk
        • Implied Leverage
        • Zero Value at Maturity
        • Liquidity Risk
      • LP Risks
        • Impermanent Loss
        • Market Risk
        • Additional Considerations for LPs
    • Audit Report - Tonbit
  • Developers
    • SDK
    • npm package
    • Integrating Fixed-Rate Staking
      • SDK - Guide for Fixed Staking
      • API - Pools Metrics Endpoint
  • Links
    • Website
    • Telegram App
    • Telegram Channel
    • Telegram Community
    • X (Twitter)
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Composition Risk of Early Withdrawals
  • Time-Dependent Risk Profile
  • Pool Utilization Dynamics
  • Risk Management Strategies for Liquidity Providers
  1. Security
  2. Risks
  3. LP Risks

Market Risk

Beyond impermanent loss, liquidity providers face broader market risks, especially when exiting positions before maturity.

Composition Risk of Early Withdrawals

When you withdraw from a liquidity pool, you receive a mix of the two pool assets based on the current pool ratio. This ratio shifts over time due to trading activity and price movements:

  • If PT prices have fallen relative to the underlying asset since your deposit, you'll receive proportionally more PTs and less of the underlying asset

  • If PT prices have risen relative to the underlying asset, you'll receive proportionally less PTs and more of the underlying asset

This means the asset composition you withdraw can differ significantly from what you deposited, creating exposure to relative value changes between these assets after withdrawal.

Time-Dependent Risk Profile

The market risk for liquidity providers follows a distinctive time pattern:

  • Higher risk early in the pool lifecycle: During the initial period, interest rate volatility and market sentiment can cause significant PT price movements

  • Decreasing risk as maturity approaches: As the PT convergence mechanism strengthens near maturity, price volatility typically decreases

  • Minimal risk at maturity: At the maturity date, the conversion ratio becomes fixed as PT equals its face value

This time-dependent risk profile creates natural incentives for providing liquidity over longer periods, particularly those approaching maturity.

Pool Utilization Dynamics

Market risk is also affected by how actively the pool is used:

  • Highly active pools with substantial trading volume typically experience more frequent rebalancing, potentially leading to greater asset composition changes over time

  • Less active pools may maintain more stable asset ratios but offer lower fee generation opportunities

This creates a relationship between pool activity levels and the stability of withdrawn asset compositions.

Risk Management Strategies for Liquidity Providers

Given these risk factors, liquidity providers can employ several strategies to optimize their experience:

For Managing Market Risk:

  • Be strategic about entry and exit timing, recognizing the declining risk profile as maturity approaches

  • Consider smaller, gradual entries rather than large lump-sum deposits when pools are new

  • When exiting before maturity, consider the implications of receiving a different asset mix than deposited

  • Monitor pool metrics like depth, volume, and fee generation to assess ongoing risk-return profiles

By understanding these dynamics and employing appropriate risk management strategies, liquidity providers can make more informed decisions about how yield tokenization pools might fit within their broader investment approach.

PreviousImpermanent LossNextAdditional Considerations for LPs

Last updated 22 days ago