FIVA
  • FIVA Overview
    • Introduction
    • Problem & Solution
    • Importance to the Space
  • FIVA Mechanics
    • Glossary
    • Understanding the Basics
    • Protocol Components
      • SY (Standardized Yield Token)
      • Yield Stripping
      • PT (Principal Token)
      • YT (Yield Token)
      • FIVA's AMM Design
    • Fee Structure
    • P&L in FIVA
    • FAQ
  • FIVA Manual
    • Getting Started
    • Use Cases
    • PT - Fixing Yield
    • YT - Leveraged Yield Farming
    • LP - Liquidity Provision
    • Mint - Get Liquidity from Future Yields Today
    • Arbitrage Opportunities
  • FIVA Strategies
    • EVAA
      • PT - Fixed USDT Yield
      • YT - EVAA Point Farming with up to 250x Multiplier
      • LP - Enhancing Your EVAA Returns
      • Mint - Get you Future USDT Yield now
    • Ethena
      • PT - Fixed USDe Returns
      • YT - Farming Ethena Airdrop with 60x Multiplier
      • LP - Multiple Income Streams
    • Storm Trade
      • PT - Fixed Yield on SLP
      • YT - Efficient Reward & Yield Farming on Storm
      • LP - Maximizing Returns from Storm Vaults
      • Max Supply - Determination Framework for Storm SLP Market
    • Tonstakers
      • LP - Enhancing Your Tonstakers Returns
  • FIVA Rewards
    • The Points System
    • Genesis Pass Collection
  • FIVA Pioneers Campaign
  • Security
    • Risks
      • Smart Contract Risk
      • Underlying Protocol Risk
      • Oracle Risk
      • PT Risks
        • Market Risk
        • Liquidity Risk
      • YT Risks
        • Market Risk
        • Implied Leverage
        • Zero Value at Maturity
        • Liquidity Risk
      • LP Risks
        • Impermanent Loss
        • Market Risk
        • Additional Considerations for LPs
    • Audit Report - Tonbit
  • Developers
    • SDK
    • npm package
    • Integrating Fixed-Rate Staking
      • SDK - Guide for Fixed Staking
      • API - Pools Metrics Endpoint
  • Links
    • Website
    • Telegram App
    • Telegram Channel
    • Telegram Community
    • X (Twitter)
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • The Challenge of Liquidity for Specialized Tokens
  • Slippage Impact on Transaction Costs
  • Maturity Redemption: The Slippage-Free Alternative
  • Risk Management Strategies for PT Holders
  1. Security
  2. Risks
  3. PT Risks

Liquidity Risk

The second major risk category for PT holders relates to liquidity when trading in the open market.

The Challenge of Liquidity for Specialized Tokens

PTs are specialized financial instruments with typically smaller market depth than mainstream cryptocurrencies. This limited liquidity creates several potential challenges:

  • Larger trades may experience significant slippage (price movement during execution)

  • During periods of market stress, liquidity can deteriorate rapidly

  • In extreme cases, finding counterparties willing to trade at reasonable prices may become difficult

These liquidity constraints become particularly important for users with larger positions.

Slippage Impact on Transaction Costs

Slippage refers to the difference between the expected price of a trade and the price at which it actually executes. For PTs, slippage can significantly impact transaction costs and realized returns:

  • Small transactions (relative to pool liquidity) may experience minimal slippage

  • Large transactions can move the market price substantially, resulting in significant execution costs

This slippage effect creates a practical limit on how quickly and efficiently large PT positions can be opened or closed in the market.

Maturity Redemption: The Slippage-Free Alternative

A key advantage of PTs is that they can be redeemed directly from the protocol at face value upon maturity, regardless of market liquidity conditions. This unique property offers an important risk mitigation strategy:

  • PT holders who can hold until maturity completely bypass liquidity risk and slippage concerns

  • The guaranteed redemption value provides certainty for investment planning

  • This redemption mechanism creates a natural floor for market prices as maturity approaches

For users who can align their investment horizon with PT maturity dates, this feature significantly reduces the practical impact of liquidity risk

Risk Management Strategies for PT Holders

Given these risk factors, PT holders can employ several strategies to optimize their experience:

For Liquidity Risk:

  • Size your positions appropriately relative to typical market liquidity

  • Consider breaking large trades into smaller transactions executed over time

  • Monitor liquidity conditions before executing significant trades

  • When possible, align your investment horizon with maturity dates to avoid open market selling

By understanding these dynamics and employing appropriate risk management strategies, PT holders can make more informed decisions about how these specialized tokens fit within their broader investment approach.

PreviousMarket RiskNextYT Risks

Last updated 22 days ago